Trinitarians: Is there an error in your thinking regarding Luke 1:32?

Considering the translation of it all , I doubt I could explain.... I think the basic message of the verse is lost... I am doing what I should have done years ago, and others should do too, dig a little deeper into the original translations of Gods word... I am finding out all kinds of things, looking at things from a more spiritual level..... But, I do NOT believe God allows His word to be so distorted it completely looses what He has meant to say...... and I still say, Jesus IS the manifestation of God in the flesh.... Jesus is refereed to as the *son of man*, *Rabbi* , *The Christ*, etc....... from the beginning of the Word, God has also been refered to as and in many ways and names.... Each reveals more and more about Him..... Things were and are revealed in Gods time...... that simple...... Mary was NOT to know the exact ID of the child she was to bare.. Just think how it COULD have gone IF she would have understood the HOLINESS of such a child..... She understood the specialness, if that is such a word, and even SOME of the HOLINESS he would carry, but to know He WAS God ??? I do not think a human could have stood the preasure of knowing that..... not such a young woman anyway....... go in peace...... God bless